The Federal Trade Commission will require bloggers to clearly disclose any freebies or payments they get from companies for reviewing their products.
Oct 05 2009
FTC to Bloggers: Be honest
Aug 06 2009
Thanks all my Mobile Mofuse Readers
As a self-hosted Wordpress.org site, I am able to add different plugins/widgets which add in the things which I want to do. This is the main reason why I decided to take the plunge into owning a piece of the worldwide web. Of course, there are downsides of being on your own, but my server master has been excellent in walking me through different things and calming me down when I messed things up.
Aug 01 2009
A Note about my Blogroll
Someone noticed that I had dropped them from my blogroll. I didn’t, I promise, but if you see that you are suddenly no longer on my blogroll, please let me know. I rarely remove anyone because I treat my blogroll like it’s important – I do not put just anyone on there, as I would not recommend just anyone to any of my readers.
Not that you should feel special, just to let you know that I do my best to maintain good relationships, etc… and I consider a blogroll something along those lines. (Which is why Dr. Gayle will not be removed, in hopes that he returns. He may never post again, but he does have a wealth of information already established.)
Aug 01 2009
The Biblioblog Top 50 – July
The Biblioblog Top 50 for the month of July is up! Congrats once more to Dr. Jim West, the coolest biblioblogger around. A special congrats to the movers and shakers such as Mike Whitenton (Ecce Homo) Robert C. Kashow (Tolle Lege!), Matthew Burgess (Confessions of a Bible Junkie), CD-Host (Church Discipline, No. 19), and Stephen Smuts (Biblical Paths, No. 29).
This has been a great month in the biblioblogosphere, with a lot of great dialog. Cannot wait until August!
Jul 25 2009
Church Blogger Vows to Return to Church that Dismissed him
Remember this blogger? The one who decided to question his pastor from the anonymity of the blogosphere? Well, suddenly, the police department of the town got involved (a member went to the SBC church) and the identity was revealed. For no reason. That’s right, no threats of violence – nothing, but questions the pastor. Well, the blogger has filed a lawsuit against the church because they dismissed him – they banned him from church premises. The SBC church has answered the lawsuit, to which the blogger has responded:
Continue reading “Church Blogger Vows to Return to Church that Dismissed him”
Jul 15 2009
Some of the Posts I Missed Today
I was out all day, working, and didn’t get to read my daily dose of blogs – so, I thought that I might read a few now and share some with you. By the way, I am now collecting a retirement fund so that I can sit and read blogs all day long. Please feel free to donate.
Apr 20 2009
Blogosphere and the Thought Police: You can have my Biblioblog when you pry it…
There is a move afoot to limit the freedom of speech of religious bloggers – and it is coming from within the religious community. Recently, a blogger in Florida who has chosen to take on his pastor (who was making $300,000) for various things was unmasked with the help of Google. A deputy sheriff, who was a member of the congregation, had asked Google for the assistance.
Now comes word from James McGrath:
One of the recent conservative commenters on my blog decided to write to my pastor to make sure that he is aware of the sorts of views I have.
Other bloggers are speaking out, in support of the professor, here, here and here.
I have from time to time seen search terms which tell me that others, especially those that I am in communion with, are searching for this blog. I have heard reports that my own thoughts have been attacked, and my freedom sought to be impinged; yet, this is my blog, my work if you will, and I have yet to see anyone who can shut it down.
There are times when people think they know what is best for everyone else – the writer, no doubt gifted, who ‘turned’ the professor in, assuredly has spent a considerable amount of time on his own blog, preaching and teaching, so that he has authority over another’s flock. Surely, his great work is to patrol the highways of the internet to find and to report any and all deviations from his viewpoint – report them to someone who can rightly handle the situation.
I believe that God, His Church, His Scriptures, and the Faith are established, and some say static – but people are not. Israel wasn’t. If we hold to a literal view of biblical history, we see that many times, while God didn’t change, the People did. Then there would arise someone who would challenge the Court of the King, or perhaps the Presbytery of the Temple to stop the descent. Neither the People nor the Prophet was static, but either moving to or from God. This is not dangerous – to buck the trend, or to question the current practice. It is not dangerous to seek to make more sure your foundation, to work out your own salvation with fear and with trembling – and a little blogging.
McGrath ends his post in such a manner as this,
What is dangerous to Christian faith is viewing it as though it were something static, as though the understanding of it one has as a child should remain static throughout life, or that Christianity itself could or should remain static throughout history. But perhaps more dangerous still is the conviction that our own understanding is God’s very truth -that cannot but lead to a spiritual pride and arrogance that is incompatible with the Christian faith in general, and with the fallibility of the greatest heroes of the faith as depicted in the Bible in particular.
McGrath is right – our own understanding of the truth of God must change – not because the truth changes, but because we grow. When I am teaching my children biblical things, I can only teach them in their own words, but always with the emphasis of opening their minds to what God is trying to tell them. When I started this blog, I had a focus, but while that focus has not changed, my understanding of that focus has. I have grown because of this freedom, not past the boundaries of the Gospel and the Church, but within them.
I desire to never cease learning, and never cease bing taught. While the Church is perfect, I am not, and I must constantly seek to align myself with the Christian Faith as given to the Apostles by our Lord, Jesus Christ.
It is a very terrible thing to believe that one person has the sole capital of Truth. And further yet, that one person has not the freedom to explore the Faith.
So, you can have my biblioblog when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
Dec 27 2008
Legal attack on UK blogger – An Injury to One is an Injury to All
As Roger said, this is a threat to all bloggers so I hope he doesn’t mind me (re)posting it(his). I would support something along the lines of giving bloggers the same freedom that the Press in the United States enjoys – everywhere. (Not that I want to participate in nation building.) This too is the Media – blogging is the 19th century version of the independent newspaper. We are all John Peter Zenger.
From time to time I comment on free speech online issues. This is not because I want to, but because of the threats to all bloggers which of course includes me. The best way to resist this is to highlight it.
I frequently read Guido Fawkes UK political blog for its alternative and somewhat subversive picture of what is really happening in UK politics. Today I read that a leading libel lawyer has tried to silence discussion online (and presumably succeeded in some cases) concerning one of his clients. See here for Guido’s comments. A court order threatening people with prison for revealing that there is a court order?!?
I recall that during the 80’s UK television acted as mouth-pieces for Irish terrorists. When the then government tried to prevent them, the BBC spitefully announced that “this report has been compiled in accordance with government reporting restrictions” whenever it had an relevant news, which was most nights for a couple of years. But that wasn’t censored in this way. I recall how the New Statesman in the 1960’s used to publish official D-notices, which indicated matters of vital security interest which should not be published, thereby violating them comprehensively, endangering us all, and insulting the system which was trying to protect them. They too went free. But then, they weren’t writing a blog.
UK. Free Speech. Now.
As a postscript, today I was reading a BBC piece about a new Chinese crackdown on dissent in Tibet. Apparently the Tibetan nationalists were being arrested for “trying to stir up racial hatred”; weasel words for “resisting the Chinese occupation.” Goebbels would be proud of whoever invented this phrase, I think.




