Oct 05 2009

FTC to Bloggers: Be honest

Category: Blogging, TechnologyPolycarp @ 3:32 pm

The Federal Trade Commission will require bloggers to clearly disclose any freebies or payments they get from companies for reviewing their products.

Continue reading “FTC to Bloggers: Be honest”

Tags: , ,


Aug 06 2009

Thanks all my Mobile Mofuse Readers

Category: Blogging, TechnologyPolycarp @ 10:08 am

As a self-hosted Wordpress.org site, I am able to add different plugins/widgets which add in the things which I want to do. This is the main reason why I decided to take the plunge into owning a piece of the worldwide web. Of course, there are downsides of being on your own, but my server master has been excellent in walking me through different things and calming me down when I messed things up.

Continue reading “Thanks all my Mobile Mofuse Readers”

Tags: , , , ,


Aug 01 2009

A Note about my Blogroll

Category: Blogging, TechnologyPolycarp @ 8:41 pm

Someone noticed that I had dropped them from my blogroll. I didn’t, I promise, but if you see that you are suddenly no longer on my blogroll, please let me know. I rarely remove anyone because I treat my blogroll like it’s important – I do not put just anyone on there, as I would not recommend just anyone to any of my readers.

Not that you should feel special, just to let you know that I do my best to maintain good relationships, etc… and I consider a blogroll something along those lines. (Which is why Dr. Gayle will not be removed, in hopes that he returns. He may never post again, but he does have a wealth of information already established.)

Continue reading “A Note about my Blogroll”

Tags: , , ,


Aug 01 2009

The Biblioblog Top 50 – July

Category: Blogging, TechnologyPolycarp @ 7:59 am

The Biblioblog Top 50 for the month of July is up! Congrats once more to Dr. Jim West, the coolest biblioblogger around. A special congrats to the movers and shakers such as Mike Whitenton (Ecce Homo) Robert C. Kashow (Tolle Lege!), Matthew Burgess (Confessions of a Bible Junkie), CD-Host (Church Discipline, No. 19), and Stephen Smuts (Biblical Paths, No. 29).

This has been a great month in the biblioblogosphere, with a lot of great dialog. Cannot wait until August!

Tags: ,


Jul 25 2009

Church Blogger Vows to Return to Church that Dismissed him

Category: Religious NewsPolycarp @ 11:13 pm

Remember this blogger? The one who decided to question his pastor from the anonymity of the blogosphere? Well, suddenly, the police department of the town got involved (a  member went to the SBC church) and the identity was revealed. For no reason. That’s right, no threats of violence – nothing, but questions the pastor. Well, the blogger has filed a lawsuit against the church because they dismissed him – they banned him from church premises. The SBC church has answered the lawsuit, to which the blogger has responded:

Continue reading “Church Blogger Vows to Return to Church that Dismissed him”

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


Jul 15 2009

Some of the Posts I Missed Today

Category: Blogging, Paula White, Weekly NewsPolycarp @ 11:59 pm

I was out all day, working, and didn’t get to read my daily dose of blogs – so, I thought that I might read a few now and share some with you. By the way, I am now collecting a retirement fund so that I can sit and read blogs all day long. Please feel free to donate.

Continue reading “Some of the Posts I Missed Today”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Apr 20 2009

Blogosphere and the Thought Police: You can have my Biblioblog when you pry it…

Category: Blogging, Debate/DiscussionPolycarp @ 9:32 pm

?fh=fc5e78d9237a34b5c3c29ed9b2f0ea76There is a move afoot to limit the freedom of speech of religious bloggers – and it is coming from within the religious community. Recently, a blogger in Florida who has chosen to take on his pastor (who was making $300,000) for various things was unmasked with the help of Google. A deputy sheriff, who was a member of the congregation, had asked Google for the assistance.

Now comes word from James McGrath:

One of the recent conservative commenters on my blog decided to write to my pastor to make sure that he is aware of the sorts of views I have.

Other bloggers are speaking out, in support of the professor, here, here and here.

I have from time to time seen search terms which tell me that others, especially those that I am in communion with, are searching for this blog. I have heard reports that my own thoughts have been attacked, and my freedom sought to be impinged; yet, this is my blog, my work if you will, and I have yet to see anyone who can shut it down.

There are times when people think they know what is best for everyone else – the writer, no doubt gifted, who ‘turned’ the professor in, assuredly has spent a considerable amount of time on his own blog, preaching and teaching, so that he has authority over another’s flock. Surely, his great work is to patrol the highways of the internet to find and to report any and all deviations from his viewpoint – report them to someone who can rightly handle the situation.

I believe that God, His Church, His Scriptures, and the Faith are established, and some say static – but people are not. Israel wasn’t. If we hold to a literal view of biblical history, we see that many times, while God didn’t change, the People did. Then there would arise someone who would challenge the Court of the King, or perhaps the Presbytery of the Temple to stop the descent. Neither the People nor the Prophet was static, but either moving to or from God. This is not dangerous – to buck the trend, or to question the current practice. It is not dangerous to seek to make more sure your foundation, to work out your own salvation with fear and with trembling – and a little blogging.

McGrath ends his post in such a manner as this,

What is dangerous to Christian faith is viewing it as though it were something static, as though the understanding of it one has as a child should remain static throughout life, or that Christianity itself could or should remain static throughout history. But perhaps more dangerous still is the conviction that our own understanding is God’s very truth -that cannot but lead to a spiritual pride and arrogance that is incompatible with the Christian faith in general, and with the fallibility of the greatest heroes of the faith as depicted in the Bible in particular.

McGrath is right – our own understanding of the truth of God must change – not because the truth changes, but because we grow. When I am teaching my children biblical things, I can only teach them in their own words, but always with the emphasis of opening their minds to what God is trying to tell them. When I started this blog, I had a focus, but while that focus has not changed, my understanding of that focus has. I have grown because of this freedom, not past the boundaries of the Gospel and the Church, but within them.

I desire to never cease learning, and never cease bing taught. While the Church is perfect, I am not, and I must constantly seek to align myself with the Christian Faith as given to the Apostles by our Lord, Jesus Christ.

It is a very terrible thing to believe that one person has the sole capital of Truth. And further yet, that one person has not the freedom to explore the Faith.

So, you can have my biblioblog when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.

Tags: , , ,


Apr 18 2009

My first Wordle

Category: Other PostsPolycarp @ 6:51 am

Wordle: Polycarp 1

I am okay with that!

Tags: , ,


Dec 27 2008

Legal attack on UK blogger – An Injury to One is an Injury to All

Category: Blogging, Religion and Politics, Religious NewsPolycarp @ 11:41 pm

As Roger said, this is a threat to all bloggers  so I hope he doesn’t mind me (re)posting it(his). I would support something along the lines of giving bloggers the same freedom that the Press in the United States enjoys – everywhere. (Not that I want to participate in nation building.) This too is the Media – blogging is the 19th century version of the independent newspaper. We are all John Peter Zenger.

From time to time I comment on free speech online issues.  This is not because I want to, but because of the threats to all bloggers which of course includes me.  The best way to resist this is to highlight it.

I frequently read Guido Fawkes UK political blog for its alternative and somewhat subversive picture of what is really happening in UK politics.  Today I read that a leading libel lawyer has tried to silence discussion online (and presumably succeeded in some cases) concerning one of his clients.  See here for Guido’s comments.  A court order threatening people with prison for revealing that there is a court order?!?

I recall that during the 80’s UK television acted as mouth-pieces for Irish terrorists. When the then government tried to prevent them, the BBC spitefully announced that “this report has been compiled in accordance with government reporting restrictions” whenever it had an relevant news, which was most nights for a couple of years.  But that wasn’t censored in this way.  I recall how the New Statesman in the 1960’s used to publish official D-notices, which indicated matters of vital security interest which should not be published, thereby violating them comprehensively, endangering us all, and insulting the system which was trying to protect them.  They too went free.  But then, they weren’t writing a  blog.

UK. Free Speech. Now.

As a postscript, today I was reading a BBC piece about a new Chinese crackdown on dissent in Tibet.  Apparently the Tibetan nationalists were being arrested for “trying to stir up racial hatred”; weasel words for “resisting the Chinese occupation.”  Goebbels would be proud of whoever invented this phrase, I think.

via Legal attack on UK blogger at Roger Pearse.

Tags: , , , , , , ,


Dec 23 2008

Rick Warren blames the news media, bloggers and you for the backlash (video)

Category: Religion and Politics, Religious News, Rick WarrenPolycarp @ 9:22 pm

Rick Warren has issued a video statement to his small town congregation in which he first blames everyone else for the backlash against him for his upcoming invocation at Barack Obama’s inauguration. He goes on to defend himself in his views on gay marriage. I generally have no disagreement with him on this issue, but his attack on me (well, not just me) is reprehensible.

The way that Rick Warren is talking about the media and talk radio brings to mind the reasoning behind the limiting of free speech. They he takes on us humble bloggers, blaming us for making people rude and ‘throwing bombs’.

I am against Rick Warren’s invocation, believing in that old notion of a separation of Church and State, and from Barack Obama from choosing Rick ‘Wealth Driven Life’ Warren from saying such a thing. He speaks  against those that stand against him, accusing us of hate speech and ‘Christophobia’. It is not Christophobia that we have, but the love of Christ, wishing to see the hate in His name, and the vanity in His name, and the misuse of His name cease.

Finally, he uses this video, knowing that this will be widely watched, to sell his new project – The Purpose Driven Connection – to be released in January. Note that he wants 20,000 or more of his members to use this and then they will release this to all the churches in America. Rick is planning on starting an entire internet devoted soley to the Purpose Driven cult that he has helped create.

From here:

Pastor Rick Warren, chosen by President-elect Barack Obama to pray at his inauguration, said in a video message to his church that he doesn’t equate gay relationships with incest or pedophilia, but opposes redefining marriage just as any conservative Christian would.

Warren said that disagreeing with gay-rights activists on same-sex marriage does not qualify as hate speech and doesn’t mean he is anti-gay. He said Obama chose him to give the invocation at the swearing-in to show that people with different views don’t have to demonize each other.

“We’re both willing to be criticized in order to try to bring America into a new day of civil discourse and to create a new model that says you don’t have to agree only with your side on everything,” Warren said in the video posted Monday night by Saddleback Community Church.

Gay-rights advocates were enraged that Obama had given the evangelical clergyman a prominent role at the Jan. 20 inauguration. Obama said he wanted the event to reflect diverse views and insisted he remains a “fierce advocate” of equal rights for gays.

Warren had backed Proposition 8, which banned gay marriage in his home state of California, where he founded Saddleback. He had recently said that he opposed any redefinition of marriage, including a brother marrying a sister, or an adult marrying a child.

In his video, he insisted he wasn’t equating gay marriage with incest or child molestation.

“I have in no way ever taught that homosexuality is the same thing as a forced relationship between an adult and a child, or between siblings,” Warren said. “I was trying to point out I’m not opposed to gays having their partnership. I’m opposed to gays using the term marriage for their relationship.”

On Tuesday, the church replaced a brief article on the Bible and homosexuality with an audio message on Saddlebackfamily.com to better explain the church’s view that Scripture prohibits sex outside of marriage between a man and a woman, according to Larry Ross, a Warren spokesman.

Anyone can attend Saddleback worship services. But the church article had said that gays “unwilling to repent of their homosexual lifestyle would not be accepted” as members.

Saddleback members must sign a broadly worded covenant in which they agree to follow Bible teachings. While gay relationships aren’t mentioned in the pledge, it is meant to cover the spectrum of conservative Christian belief.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,