Mar 04 2010

Undeception on Faith(fulness)

Category: TheologyPolycarp @ 11:59 am

Except for attributing Hebrews to Pauline authorship, Steve has a few excellent posts on faith and faithfulness. (here and here) I believe that Steve is right and would encourage you to read his posts. (Try my tags here and here)

But rather than mere cognitive assent to an unproved proposition, I think the best way of viewing the semantic center of pistis is in the words commitment, dependence, trust, and devotion. As I said, ”belief” plays a part, since we devote ourselves to things we believe in, and believe in things we are devoted to.

I agree – faith(fulness) is more about a conscious acceptance of the things set before you; it is about an active movement towards God and a daily walk. But, you know my position – go read Steve’s.

Tags: , ,


Feb 23 2010

The Feast Day of the Blessed Martyr Polycarp, Bishop of Smyrna

Category: Church FathersPolycarp @ 6:59 pm

Today, 23 February, several communions celebrate the death of Polycarp, Bishop of Smyrna on the date that Tradition has delivered to us as the day that he was burned alive for his faith.

Continue reading “The Feast Day of the Blessed Martyr Polycarp, Bishop of Smyrna”

Tags: , , , , ,


Feb 23 2010

Contributors and Political Reconciliation

Category: Religion and PoliticsPolycarp @ 11:59 am

As you, my dear friends, may know, I have different contributors posting at different times on this blog. Wait, it gets better.

Continue reading “Contributors and Political Reconciliation”

Tags: , ,


Feb 20 2010

This is your brain – This is your brain on faith

Category: TechnologyPolycarp @ 11:59 am

Read the whole article:

Newberg argues that religious belief is often personally and socially advantageous, allowing men and women to “imagine a better future.” And he does not contend, as philosophically lazy scientists sometimes do, that a biological propensity toward belief automatically disproves the existence of an object of such belief. “Neuroscience cannot tell you if God does or doesn’t exist,” Newberg states with appropriate humility. Neurobiology helps explain religion; it does not explain it away.

But Newberg’s research offers warnings for the religious as well. Contemplating a loving God strengthens portions of our brain — particularly the frontal lobes and the anterior cingulate — where empathy and reason reside. Contemplating a wrathful God empowers the limbic system, which is “filled with aggression and fear.” It is a sobering concept: The God we choose to love changes us into his image, whether he exists or not.

For Newberg, this is not a simple critique of religious fundamentalism — a phenomenon varied in its beliefs and motivations. It is a criticism of any institution that allies ideology or faith with anger and selfishness. “The enemy is not religion,” writes Newberg, “the enemy is anger, hostility, intolerance, separatism, extreme idealism, and prejudicial fear — be it secular, religious, or political.”

Michael Gerson – Neuroscientist Andrew Newberg on the Brain and Faith – washingtonpost.com.

Interesting, but is there really anything there? Are they just using science to try to explain the unexplainable? And, does this mean that atheists don’t have brains?

Tags: , , , ,


Feb 16 2010

Faith, Fundamentalism and Time

Category: TheologyPolycarp @ 11:59 am

For the majority of those ‘outside’ the Church, the teaching contained in the primary documents of the Christian faith is seen today as being mostly irrelevant to the modern world. It belongs to another time. It is not ’scientific’. It contains miraculous elements which, to the modern person, seem completely unbelievable, and its historical accuracy (it is assumed) cannot be proved. So that when we stand on our podium (either actual or metaphorical) and confidently proclaim “the Bible says….” there is a sullen, insinuated ‘So what?’ hanging in the air over the heads of any secular hearers. This situation has led to a rise in the number of fundamentalists of all kinds; people like Richard Dawkins and Ken Ham; people who have been driven to extreme claims of certainty that this or that event happened exactly as related in science or scripture at a certain point in time in a specific way.

Read the rest:

Guest Post by Chris Lazenby: Faith, Fundamentalism and Time | eChurch Christian Blog.

Tags: ,


Feb 09 2010

Faith Beyond Thought – Hebrews 11 and the Christian Life

Category: Hebrews, TheologyPolycarp @ 11:59 am

T.C.’s post got me thinking (See Damian’s sorta of response to T.C.’s post, then check out Jeremy’s post as well, as well as this one), rather rethinking about a subject which I have written about previously, and for some reason, I don’t believe that I have accurately, or completely, stated my position on. (See here and here)

Continue reading “Faith Beyond Thought – Hebrews 11 and the Christian Life”

Tags: ,


Feb 02 2010

Alexander Campbell on the Common Measure of Christians

Category: ReformationPolycarp @ 11:59 am

That would be faith:

“But men cannot give up their opinions, and therefore, they can never unite, says one. We do not ask them to give up their opinions–we ask them only not to impose them upon others. Let them hold their opinions, but let them hold them as private property. The faith is public property; opinions are, and always have been private property. Men have foolishly attempted to make the deductions of some great minds the common measure of all Christians. Hence the deductions of a Luther, and a Calvin, and a Wesley, have been the rule and measure of all who coalesce under the names of these leaders. It is cruel to excommunicate a man because of the imbecility of his intellect.”

HT

Tags: ,


Jan 23 2010

God favours Johnny Cash

Category: Other PostsNewtaste @ 12:03 am

So says this:

How many people leave this earth knowing that their work here is truly done? That they have given all they can? Johnny Cash did. Continue reading

Tags: ,


Jan 11 2010

Faith as a Daily Commitment

Category: TheologyPolycarp @ 12:59 pm

A few months ago, we explored what πίστις meant. It is not a mere acknowledgment or belief, but an ongoing and active commitment. Do you have faith in God? If so, then it will lead to a life of commitment to God. It is not a mere ‘Lord, I believe.’ It is a ‘Lord I will live my belief.’

If faith is our daily commitment, then there is no different between ‘faith’ and ‘the faith’ in the New Testament. We have seemingly drawn a line between belief (faith) and our Christian religion (the Faith) but were the New Testament writers, men who lives in the ancient world when the Christian faith was daily exercised, seeing a difference? Recently, a fellow blogger started to discuss something similar. As one commenter said,

I have a friend (Gentile) who works for a Messianic Jewish ministry in Ohio. He has mentioned to me on many occasions on how the Jewish people in the Old Testament had zero concept in separating faith from other aspects of their life. It would have been totally foreign to their way of thinking; something that they wouldn’t even be able to fathom.

If faith was meant to be a one time action, then nothing else would be needed. There would be no call to holiness, no sacraments, nothing. Instead, we would find a weekly venture to a congregational setting, mandatory bible reading, and a few good deeds here or there. But if faith is a daily commitment in which we live what we believe, we find ourselves in daily worship, in sacraments, in holiness because our practice, our living liturgy, exercises our spirit towards God.

The same author made mention that it is possible that due to such things as the Protestant Reformation, many Western Christians have allowed themselves to stop interacting and reliving the divine reality. There are always extremes in social movements, and while you can lay at the feet of Zwingli and others the end of a daily interaction with the faith, you cannot do so with Luther or Calvin. When things simply become a human ritual, such as baptism and the Eucharist, then they loose their intrinsic worth and value; however, if one was to live their baptism daily and enjoy the Eucharist as a true memorial of the Cross then an exercise of faith has occurred.

During the early persecutions, the Church was under constant attack and many Christians lapsed and sacrificed to pagan gods. Because of this, there was a movement to excommunicate these people. Eventually, a sort of compromise was reached in which Communion was withheld from those souls who had lapsed, but upon their death-bed, they could once again receive it. Such was the life of the Christian that the denial of communion was heart wrenching – not in some idea that the bread and wine was some how magical, but that it was mystical, that it was a mystery which the saint knew and could experience with others and to have it withheld was damaging. Yet, we know many who would wait out their lives in solitude from the communion, waiting to experience once more the presence of God as the congregation gathered around the death-bed to administer what was the symbol of the blood and the body of Christ which had been broken – which the lapsed had denied as cowards. This was more than a one time belief or acknowledge, but a life lived in anxious anticipation of the body of Christ.

Many times, I find that when people get ‘out of practice’ of serving God they began to lose their hope in God. Yes, they acknowledge God, but with their mouth while their hearts retreat. Faith is not about church service, but about communing with God. It is a daily fight, a daily walk, a daily baptism and a daily communion. Peter warned us not to lose our ’secure footing’ (2nd Peter 3.17) in the faith but to grow in ‘grace and knowledge’ (2nd Peter 3.18). How do we grow? By daily exercise. This is the faith of our Fathers. We look at the Patriarchs and God gave to them a divine year, centered around remembering the things that He had done for them. (Exodus 12-13) Why? Because it grew the people together to collectively remember God. It was a daily walk for the Israelites. And for us? Do we not have our daily walk with God? Do we not have our memorials and our remembrances?

If faith for you is a one time event, if the Cross is a distant memory, than your faith is dead and can give no works. If, however, your faith is one which moves you forward and one which you daily interact with, one in which the Cross is never far from your mind and heart in which whether you look to the side to the front of even behind you, it is not peripheral, then your faith is living. Christ is not dead but alive; He has risen and He walks with you; He has ascended and yet He walks with you. Exercise your faith (1st Timothy 4.7-8)

Tags: ,


Jan 08 2010

Friday’s Question of the Day: Faith

Category: Atheism, Debate/DiscussionPolycarp @ 9:09 am

We’ve recently had a few discussions on atheism, so this might be a fitting question:

Have you ever lost faith or come close to it? What kept you from going all the way or what pushed you over the edge? Did you recover?

If you want to be anonymous, just post it as such and I’ll approve all serious comments. (No spam)

Tags: ,


Next Page »