Sep 15 2009

Mark Goodacre and the Open Mic

Category: Religious NewsPolycarp @ 7:08 pm

Excellent news, dear readers!

Good afternoon,

I thought the readers of your blog might be interested in this. Mark Goodacre at NT Blog has agreed to hold live, online “office hours” this Friday, Sept. 18, at noon EDT on Duke’s Ustream page: http://www.ustream.tv/dukeuniversity. Professor Goodacre will be giving his take on “the New Testament in the news” — and responding to questions from anyone who submits them online.

To submit a question, in advance or during the webcast, email live@duke.edu , tweet with the tag #dukelive, or post a comment on this Facebook page — http://apps.facebook.com/dukeuniversitylive/.

I hope you will consider watching the webcast and participating. If you are interested in sharing this event, you can also embed the live video of the event using the embed codes on the Ustream site here: http://www.ustream.tv/dukeuniversity.

For more info, see the Duke News story at http://news.duke.edu/2009/09/goodacre.html.

Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information.

Many Thanks,

Meg McKee

Tags: , , , , ,


Sep 15 2009

My Translation of Philemon

Category: Bible Translation, PhilemonPolycarp @ 1:30 pm

In moving to discuss the destruction of social constructions in Philemon, I wanted to share with you my translation of this short letter. Feel free to destroy if necessary:

Continue reading “My Translation of Philemon”

Tags: ,


Sep 14 2009

The Unknown Chloe: 1st Corinthians 1.11 in light of the Roman Household

Category: CorinthiansPolycarp @ 8:02 pm

Many times, people focus on Phoebe (Romans 16.1) as an example of the woman’s role in primitive Christianity – but what about Chloe?

For it has been declared to me concerning you, my brethren, by those of Chloe’s household, that there are contentions among you. (1Co 1:11 NKJ)

We know several things about the background of 1st Corinthians, the first and foremost, that the local church was undergoing factionalism. At this time, local congregations did not meet in a large assembly hall, but in homes, perhaps many homes, throughout the city. Further, we know that women were rarely given the same social standing as men.

Continue reading “The Unknown Chloe: 1st Corinthians 1.11 in light of the Roman Household”

Tags: , , , , ,


Sep 12 2009

Top 10 worst Bible passages (And 2 other Top 10 Lists)

Category: Religious NewsPolycarp @ 8:00 pm

You can read the rest of the article below. Do we really need to explain this, or the difference between the Law (OT) and Grace (NT)?

Continue reading “Top 10 worst Bible passages (And 2 other Top 10 Lists)”

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


Aug 03 2009

Canon within a Canon (Meme, anyone?)

Category: Debate/DiscussionPolycarp @ 9:49 am

Last week, John Anderson wrote about his canon within a canon. He writes,

Brevard Childs has argued that the process of canonization allowed for a certain ‘leveling,’ a general equality as it concerns the various books of the Bible.  Obadiah is just as authoritative as the gospel of Matthew, and Genesis just as seminal as Philemon.  While I do think there is great merit in such a view–quite a Jewish view, no less, as the Jewish Midrashim affirm just such an equality, using one text to interpret another–none of us is an entirely disinterested interpreter.  We all have our own experiences, ideologies, and idiosyncracies that inform our reading of texts.  And because of this, the canonical ‘leveling’ is in a way distorted.

Continue reading “Canon within a Canon (Meme, anyone?)”

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


Jul 14 2009

Time and Codex Sinaiticus

Category: Bible Translation, Religious NewsPolycarp @ 11:59 pm

The blogger at Biblical Paths, and excellent conservative blog, points us to Time magazine’s article on the important Codex. Further, he gives us an excellent video on some of the restoration techniques of the 1600 year old manuscript:

Tags: , , , , , ,


Apr 19 2009

Jewish scholar to shed light on Jesus, the Jew, in church

Category: Messianic JudaismPolycarp @ 1:51 am

As a Jew and a leading American New Testament scholar, Amy-Jill Levine is unique. Kansas Citians will have a chance to glean insights from her next weekend when she serves as visiting scholar for Village Presbyterian Church.

Amy-Jill Levine

Levine, a professor of New Testament studies at Vanderbilt University Divinity School is author of “The Misunderstood Jew: The Church and the Scandal of the Jewish Jesus” (2006, HarperOne).

Levine will also lead a seminar for local clergy members Friday morning, April 24, on the topic: “How to Avoid Bearing False Witness — I Didn’t Mean to Sound Like a Bigot.”

Rabbi Alan Cohen, who now does interfaith work for the Jewish Community Relations Bureau/American Jewish Committee, said he hopes the clergy session will build on a similar one held in conjunction with the local display of “A Blessing to One Another,” the exhibit on Pope John Paul II and the Jewish people

Rabbi Cohen said the purpose of such meetings is “increasing understanding among faiths and building better bridges for future interfaith dialogue, engagement and action.”

Levine, he said, “will continue the teaching of texts from both Tanakh and New Testament in an attempt to create better understanding and less misuse of the texts. … We had 100 people at the first Institute, and I hope to surpass that number on the 24th.”

In preparation for her visit, The Chronicle posed a series of questions to Professor Levine via e-mail. The questions and her responses follow.

Q. How and why did a Jewish woman with a traditional religious background (as I am told you have) become a New Testament scholar?

A: Growing up in a predominantly Roman Catholic neighborhood, I was fascinated by my friends’ traditions and stories, and I was shocked when a girl on the school bus accused me of having killed her Lord. I wanted to understand this tradition that had both beautiful and problematic aspects.

Q: Everyone knows Jesus was a Jew. But it seems that, in the last decade or so, the Christian church (in America, anyway) is acknowledging this ever more readily and devoting more and more serious study to the implications of that fact. Do you agree? If so, why has this been the case?

A: Churches are increasingly recognizing Jesus’ Judaism, in part in response to and repentance for centuries of anti-Jewish preaching, and in part to recover the depth of meaning of his words and actions, to hear him as his first followers, all Jews, heard him.

Q: What does Jesus’ Judaism imply for Christians today?

A: Taking the incarnation — the divine becoming human — seriously should lead to a serious consideration of the time and place where this event occurred. To take Jesus out of his historical context will both distort his teachings and lead to anti-Jewish misconceptions.

Read the rest here.

Tags: , , , , , ,


Apr 10 2009

Melito of Sardis: Mystery of the Passover

Category: Church Fathers, Melito of SardisPolycarp @ 3:51 pm

This is a series of repost for Easter from Melito of Sardis.

What more can I add here?

Components of the Mystery of the Passover (46-71)

1. The Passover (46-47a)

46. Now that you have heard the explanation of the type and of that which corresponds to it, hear also what goes into making up the mystery. What is the passover? Indeed its name is derived from that event–”to celebrate the passover” (to paschein) is derived from “to suffer” (tou pathein). Therefore, learn who the sufferer is and who he is who suffers along with the sufferer.

47. Why indeed was the Lord present upon the earth? In order that having clothed himself with the one who suffers, he might lift him up to the heights of heaven.

2. The Creation and Fall of Man (47b-48)

In the beginning, when God made heaven and earth, and everything in them through his word, he himself formed man from the earth and shared with that form his own breath, he himself placed him in paradise, which was eastward in Eden, and there they lived most luxuriously.

Then by way of command God gave them this law: For your food you may eat from any tree, but you are not to eat from the tree of the one who knows good and evil. For on the day you eat from it, you most certainly will die.

48. But man, who is by nature capable of receiving good and evil as soil of the earth is capable of receiving seeds from both sides, welcomed the hostile and greedy counselor, and by having touched that tree transgressed the command, and disobeyed God. As a consequence, he was cast out into this world as a condemned man is cast into prison.

3. Consequences of the Fall (49-56)

49. And when he had fathered many children, and had grown very old, and had returned to the earth through having tasted of the tree, an inheritance was left behind by him for his children. Indeed, he left his children an inheritance–not of chastity but of unchastity, not of immortality but of corruptibility, not of honor but of dishonor, not of freedom but of slavery, not of sovereignty but of tyranny, not of life but of death, not of salvation but of destruction.

50. Extraordinary and terrifying indeed was the destruction of men upon the earth. For the following things happened to them: They were carried off as slaves by sin, the tyrant, and were led away into the regions of desire where they were totally engulfed by insatiable sensual pleasures–by adultery, by unchastity, by debauchery, by inordinate desires, by avarice, by murders, by bloodshed, by the tyranny of wickedness, by the tyranny of lawlessness.

51. For even a father of his own accord lifted up a dagger against his son; and a son used his hands against his father; and the impious person smote the breasts that nourished him; and brother murdered brother; and host wronged his guest; and friend assassinated friend; and one man cut the throat of another with his tyrannous right hand.

52. Therefore all men on the earth became either murderers, or parricides, or killers of their children. And yet a thing still more dreadful and extraordinary was to be found: A mother attacked the flesh which she gave birth to, a mother attacked those whom her breasts had nourished; and she buried in her belly the fruit of her belly. Indeed, the ill-starred mother became a dreadful tomb, when she devoured the child which she bore in her womb.

53. But in addition to this there were to be found among men many things still more monstrous and terrifying and brutal: father cohabits with his child, and son and with his mother, and brother with sister, and male with male, and each man lusting after the wife of his neighbor.

54. Because of these things sin exulted, which, because it was death’s collaborator, entered first into the souls of men, and prepared as food for him the bodies of the dead. In every soul sin left its mark, and those in whom it placed its mark were destined to die.

55. Therefore, all flesh fell under the power of sin, and every body under the dominion of death, for every soul was driven out from its house of flesh. Indeed, that which had been taken from the earth was dissolved again into earth, and that which had been given from God was locked up in Hades. And that beautiful ordered arrangement was dissolved, when the beautiful body was separated (from the soul).

56. Yes, man was divided up into parts by death. Yes, an extraordinary misfortune and captivity enveloped him: he was dragged away captive under the shadow of death, and the image of the Father remained there desolate. For this reason, therefore, the mystery of the passover has been completed in the body of the Lord.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,


Apr 09 2009

Melito of Sardis: The Old Testament and the New Testament

Category: Church Fathers, Melito of Sardis, Messianic JudaismPolycarp @ 9:00 am

I am reposting Melito for Easter.

I have posted on Melito some before, and find myself returning to him for a bit especially his homily on the Passover. He provides us with an accurate manner in using the Old Testament, and it is an example that is well served for the past few millenia. He does not create something that is not there, no drench the Prophets with our Hope, but stands in the good Tradition of using the New Testament to read the Old. For a New Testament example of this, we need to turn no further, dig no deeper than the Epistle to the Hebrews.

Note, if you will, the powerful images that Melito presents us with.

39. Therefore, if it was like this with models of perishable objects, so indeed will it also be with those of imperishable objects. If it was like this with earthly things, so indeed also will it be with heavenly things. For even the Lord’s salvation and his truth were prefigured in the people, and the teaching of the gospel was proclaimed in advance by the law[1].

40. The people, therefore, became the model for the church, and the law a parabolic sketch. But the gospel became the explanation of the law and its fulfillment, while the church became the storehouse of truth.

41. Therefore, the type had value prior to its realization, and the parable was wonderful prior to its interpretation. This is to say that the people had value before the church came on the scene, and the law was wonderful before the gospel was brought to light.

42. But when the church came on the scene, and the gospel was set forth, the type lost its value by surrendering its significance to the truth, and the law was fulfilled by surrendering its significance to the gospel. Just as the type lost its significance by surrendering its image to that which is true by nature, and as the parable lost its significance by being illumined through the interpretation,

43. So indeed also the law was fulfilled when the gospel was brought to light, and the people lost their significance when the church came on the scene, and the type was destroyed when the Lord appeared. Therefore, those things which once had value are today without value, because the things which have true value have appeared.

44. For at one time the sacrifice to the sheep was valuable, but now it is without value because of the life of the Lord. The death of the sheep once was valuable, but now it is without value because of the salvation of the Lord. The blood of the sheep once was valuable, but now it is without value because of the Spirit of the Lord. The silent lamb once was valuable, but now it has no value because of the blameless Son. The temple here below once was valuable, but now it is without value because of the Christ from above.

45. The Jerusalem here below once had value, but now it is without value because of the Jerusalem from above. The meager inheritance once had value; now it is without value because of the abundant grace. For not in one place alone, nor yet in narrow confines, has the glory of God been established, but his grace has been poured out upon the uttermost parts of the inhabited world, and there the almighty God has taken up his dwelling place through Jesus Christ, to whom be the glory for ever. Amen.


[1] Many in the Messianic Judaism movement would have us ignore the longstanding Tradition of the Church, which the Old Testament is a type and shadow of the New – physical Israel is prefigures the New, and thus, when the figure comes into view, the shadow is regulated by the Light. Those things in the Temple are now Old and used only for a continued example to point to Christ. The Law itself is nothing more than a fulfilled promise. Melito expands his first point with this entire section.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,


Apr 04 2009

Just in Time for Easter – Who was the real Jesus?

Category: Religious NewsPolycarp @ 7:00 am

No matter the holiday, at least the Christian ones, our ‘educational’ channels which we pay for as consumers, like to pick apart those believes that we hold dear. Granted, it’s almost expected now. It’s like the Christmas lights – you just have to have them. This year, there is a move to undermine the ‘historical Jesus.’ Suddenly, everyone got it wrong, and history is a grand conspiracy by men in white hats.

Biblical scholar Rachel Havrelock is a MythBuster in her own right, dispelling popular beliefs about Christianity. The University of Illinois at Chicago professor traveled to the Holy Land to co-host the Discovery Channel documentary “Who Was Jesus?” which premiers April 5, Palm Sunday.

Havrelock recently sat down to speak with Discovery News’ Jennifer Viegas about the historical Jesus, what she feels are some common misconceptions, and the role women played during Christianity’s earliest years.

Discovery News: What do you think is the most common misconception today about the Bible and its teachings?

Rachel Havrelock: That it was meant to present a very conservative, traditional viewpoint. You must remember that the concept of God was, and perhaps still is, a radical social idea. Rather than being beholden to an oligarchy, an individual can now answer to a deity. It created the possibility of an egalitarian society.

The core of Jesus’ message was directed to the economically downtrodden, the poor farmers, laborers and others who had little power in their own lives. Jesus presented a radical social proposition that meant society could be reconfigured to allow for less inequity and more sharing.

Continue reading “Just in Time for Easter – Who was the real Jesus?”

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


Next Page »