One of the most forgotten men in the Scriptures is Joseph, who was a man from the line of David who had a certain Jewish girl espoused to him. He makes a small appearance in Matthew and Luke, the only two Gospels to record something about him. His name appears only a few times in all of the New Testament. It is only in Matthew’s work which we find him and his actions as any part of the story,
Now the birth of Jesus Christ was as follows: After His mother Mary was betrothed to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Spirit. Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not wanting to make her a public example, was minded to put her away secretly. But while he thought about these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take to you Mary your wife, for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit. And she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name JESUS, for He will save His people from their sins.” So all this was done that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Lord through the prophet, saying: “Behold, the virgin shall be with child, and bear a Son, and they shall call His name Immanuel,” which is translated, “God with us.” Then Joseph, being aroused from sleep, did as the angel of the Lord commanded him and took to him his wife, and did not know her till she had brought forth her firstborn Son. And he called His name JESUS. (Matthew 1:18-25 NKJV)
A wise man once said that the words that we read are the headlines, and this is especially true in this case. We find a great story of love and sacrifice in Joseph, in as much as he was willing to become an outcast – if only temporarily – in order to protect Mary, the young girl who he would have paid a dowry – the young girl who carried the public signs of a betrayal. The law required death for Mary. In this instance, we find the first shadow of the Grace which was to come.
The law is clear – death for Mary:
“If a young woman who is a virgin is betrothed to a husband, and a man finds her in the city and lies with her, then you shall bring them both out to the gate of that city, and you shall stone them to death with stones, the young woman because she did not cry out in the city, and the man because he humbled his neighbor’s wife; so you shall put away the evil from among you. (Deuteronomy 22:23-24 NKJV)
Mary was considered evil – a blot on the community, something to be killed and done away with – exterminated ruthlessly. We see something in the horror of the law that is not mentioned – the great love of Joseph for Mary. He would have paid a dowry, perhaps a goodly sum for the espousal. He would have made preparations for Mary in his home, and already giving her that which was sacred – his family name. I can only imagine what love he had for her and the loss he felt to have gone so far but to have been betrayed with such a great sin. She had slandered him, his family, and his family name.
Joseph had such a love that he was determined to take the ridicule, the shame, and give her the bill of divorce privately. Like anyone in pain due to love, with his heart breaking, he most likely took time, mourning, to determine his next course of action for the young Jewish girl whom he clearly loved.
If we step away from Joseph, to a higher plane, we can see the sovereignty of God in this matter. God did not just choose Mary, and because of that Joseph, for no reason. Joseph was a man of great love (Mary with her own qualities), a love that would rather endure shame and the outcast of a community instead of harming Mary. He would risk breaking the Law of Moses to protect someone who he loved. What better caretaker for the son of God?
Returning to Joseph, we find that it was in the middle of his deliberations – I can imagine them maddening and tortured – that the Angel of the Lord appeared to him with words of consolation. So, with this love of Joseph, we find faith. Joseph disobeyed the cultural mores of ancient Palestine, obeying rather the will of God, and held Mary as his wife, in the face of what would have been certain opposition from everyone, perhaps even his parents as well as Mary’s.
So, we have a picture of Grace and Love in the life of Christ even before He began His ministry. Joseph was ready to sacrifice his standing in his family and community to save the life of a pregnant girl – a trollop, a whore, a sinner – and to protect her and her unborn Son – the bastard child of this trollop and perhaps a Roman solider, Panthera – from the death demanded by the Torah. It was because of this love that the Angel appeared to Joseph the Carpenter and told him that this Child would be the deliverer of all Israel. His wife who was dead to him was now alive again.
If we remove the doctrine and traditions that surround both Mary and Joseph, we find a picture of grace – we find love – we find a truly holy family.






#1 by Fr. Robert (Anglican) on December 24, 2009 – 6:09 pm
If we remove “the doctrine and traditions” of both Mary and Joseph, we have nothing! For Scripture itself is both doctrine and tradition, least for the Catholic understanding. Also not sure what the community around Joseph and Mary knew really? St. Luke 2: 19-35
#2 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 6:13 pm
Yes, because that is what this post was about. Please try to stay on point and in Scripture.
I could care less for your present understanding, after all, I thought you said you would leave this blog alone. Perhaps its time you became truthful in this matter.
#3 by Fr. Robert (Anglican) on December 24, 2009 – 6:18 pm
It is rather hard sometimes to see you state mis-truth…really hard! But you are right, it’s your bog. But you know next to nothing about “Catholic” doctrine and tradition!
#4 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 6:20 pm
Tell me, where in this post did I ‘state mis-truth?’ I know plenty about ‘Catholic’ doctrine and tradition and I know plenty about you. Remember, stay on point about this post.
#5 by Fr. Robert (Anglican) on December 24, 2009 – 2:09 pm
If we remove “the doctrine and traditions” of both Mary and Joseph, we have nothing! For Scripture itself is both doctrine and tradition, least for the Catholic understanding. Also not sure what the community around Joseph and Mary knew really? St. Luke 2: 19-35
#6 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 2:13 pm
Yes, because that is what this post was about. Please try to stay on point and in Scripture.
I could care less for your present understanding, after all, I thought you said you would leave this blog alone. Perhaps its time you became truthful in this matter.
#7 by Fr. Robert (Anglican) on December 24, 2009 – 2:18 pm
It is rather hard sometimes to see you state mis-truth…really hard! But you are right, it’s your bog. But you know next to nothing about “Catholic” doctrine and tradition!
#8 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 2:20 pm
Tell me, where in this post did I ‘state mis-truth?’ I know plenty about ‘Catholic’ doctrine and tradition and I know plenty about you. Remember, stay on point about this post.
#9 by Fr. Robert (Anglican) on December 24, 2009 – 6:58 pm
The Sacred or Holy Scripture is itself both doctrine and tradition, given to the Church Catholic! (1 Tim.3:15). And as I said, what did the community really know around or about Joseph and Mary. Again, Luke 2:19-35. But this is my last statement, promise. As you said, this is your blog.
#10 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 9:32 pm
Yeah, I’ve that and a whole host of other statements which turned out rather false before.
Wow, what a difference a day makes, huh? Suddenly, Tradition is above Scripture? Or, are you just trying to make a point, again, and fail miserably at doing so?
#11 by Fr. Robert (Anglican) on December 24, 2009 – 10:25 pm
If I seek to answer, then I break my word again (so-called), and you will try again to use this against me, on this your “bully pulpit”… blog. Haven’t we both had enough of each other? I’m sure we have! Let’s have silence between ourselves, and cease.
Peace of Christ,
#12 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 10:29 pm
Wow.
#13 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 10:29 pm
Wow.
#14 by Fr. Robert (Anglican) on December 24, 2009 – 10:25 pm
If I seek to answer, then I break my word again (so-called), and you will try again to use this against me, on this your “bully pulpit”… blog. Haven’t we both had enough of each other? I’m sure we have! Let’s have silence between ourselves, and cease.
Peace of Christ,
#15 by Fr. Robert (Anglican) on December 24, 2009 – 2:58 pm
The Sacred or Holy Scripture is itself both doctrine and tradition, given to the Church Catholic! (1 Tim.3:15). And as I said, what did the community really know around or about Joseph and Mary. Again, Luke 2:19-35. But this is my last statement, promise. As you said, this is your blog.
#16 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 5:32 pm
Yeah, I’ve that and a whole host of other statements which turned out rather false before.
Wow, what a difference a day makes, huh? Suddenly, Tradition is above Scripture? Or, are you just trying to make a point, again, and fail miserably at doing so?
#17 by Fr. Robert (Anglican) on December 24, 2009 – 6:25 pm
If I seek to answer, then I break my word again (so-called), and you will try again to use this against me, on this your “bully pulpit”… blog. Haven’t we both had enough of each other? I’m sure we have! Let’s have silence between ourselves, and cease.
Peace of Christ,
#18 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 6:29 pm
Wow.
#19 by steph on December 24, 2009 – 7:47 pm
That’s absolutely lovely, Joel. I hope you and your family have a wonderful Christmas together.
#20 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 9:32 pm
Thank you a great deal, Steph, and to your and yours a warm (which I know you already have) holiday season.
#21 by steph on December 24, 2009 – 10:01 pm
Thanks – but I haven’t! Maurice and I are housebound with snow and horridible ice while my large whanau are congregating down in Aotearoa at the beach!! But I just love the picture you’ve recreated. That’s warmly wonderful.
#22 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 10:14 pm
Here, the snow is melting, and we are expecting a rather nice day tomorrow with some family. Presents in the morning, I reckon, then Turkey, blessed Turkey. Its a real tradition.
#23 by steph on December 25, 2009 – 1:39 am
Bliss …. I expect my whanau will be having a barbecue – last year the boys went bush and shot a goat, a rabbit and a pig or was it a deer, hung, marinated and barbecued with lots of salads … of course I skip the meats but still participate in it’s cooking. And then of course piles of presents for millions of children – mainly homemade, they’re a crafty lot my family – and big decorated pine tree dripping with pine needles, Christmas lilies with heavenly scent … I wanna go home!!!!
#24 by Polycarp on December 25, 2009 – 1:41 am
Mean kiwi…just mean….
We’ll have our turkey and stuffing/dressing tomorrow with a carrot souffle, bread rolls, iced tea, broccoli and cheese casserole and some dessert.
#25 by Polycarp on December 25, 2009 – 1:41 am
Mean kiwi…just mean….
We’ll have our turkey and stuffing/dressing tomorrow with a carrot souffle, bread rolls, iced tea, broccoli and cheese casserole and some dessert.
#26 by steph on December 25, 2009 – 1:39 am
Bliss …. I expect my whanau will be having a barbecue – last year the boys went bush and shot a goat, a rabbit and a pig or was it a deer, hung, marinated and barbecued with lots of salads … of course I skip the meats but still participate in it’s cooking. And then of course piles of presents for millions of children – mainly homemade, they’re a crafty lot my family – and big decorated pine tree dripping with pine needles, Christmas lilies with heavenly scent … I wanna go home!!!!
#27 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 10:20 pm
You know, Steph, while you are snowbound…if you wanted to write a post on the value of modern scholarship…. Just saying
#28 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 10:20 pm
You know, Steph, while you are snowbound…if you wanted to write a post on the value of modern scholarship…. Just saying
#29 by steph on December 25, 2009 – 1:47 am
That would be an independent historical critical approach … not all modern scholarship is helpful – we’ve still got the apologists and the religion hating atheists and the blinking mythers!
#30 by Polycarp on December 25, 2009 – 1:54 am
True and fair enough. Of course, some believe that any scholarship except that which conforms to their standard is inherently evil. Personally, I am looking forward to spending more time in 2nd Temple Judaism, with the aid of Bauckham
hoping to end the year in a Master’s program. I’m not a fan of some of the historical critical methods, but I did like the social memory concept of the Historigraphical Jesus.
#31 by steph on December 25, 2009 – 2:13 am
And 2nd Temple Judaism will be very ‘helpful’, and Bauckham has produced some excellent work … although he’s beginning to slide dangerously towards apologetics…
I wasn’t impressed with the method applied by whats his name in Historiographical Jesus and what he avoids although April de Conick has done excellent and very helpful work on social memory.
#32 by steph on December 25, 2009 – 2:13 am
And 2nd Temple Judaism will be very ‘helpful’, and Bauckham has produced some excellent work … although he’s beginning to slide dangerously towards apologetics…
I wasn’t impressed with the method applied by whats his name in Historiographical Jesus and what he avoids although April de Conick has done excellent and very helpful work on social memory.
#33 by Polycarp on December 25, 2009 – 2:15 am
I think that Le Donne has a good start, but I also believe that he is circular somewhat with Tradition, especially Incarnational viewpoints. He essentially comes to the same conclusion an apologist would but with more roads traveled.
#34 by steph on December 25, 2009 – 2:19 am
Le Donne – yes! I had to go and look. It’s on the floor by Maurice’s desk …. and it’s snowing! Yuck…
#35 by Polycarp on December 25, 2009 – 2:22 am
Hahha! It was 50 today!
#36 by Polycarp on December 25, 2009 – 2:22 am
Hahha! It was 50 today!
#37 by steph on December 25, 2009 – 2:33 am
You’re cruel! I think 50 is more than 10 – we’re minus 4. It never gets cold like this at home.
#38 by Polycarp on December 25, 2009 – 2:34 am
Hahhahahahaha!
#39 by steph on December 25, 2009 – 2:42 am
:-p
oh well I’m glad your children have better weather anyway
#40 by steph on December 25, 2009 – 2:42 am
:-p
oh well I’m glad your children have better weather anyway
#41 by Polycarp on December 25, 2009 – 2:34 am
Hahhahahahaha!
#42 by steph on December 25, 2009 – 2:33 am
You’re cruel! I think 50 is more than 10 – we’re minus 4. It never gets cold like this at home.
#43 by steph on December 25, 2009 – 2:19 am
Le Donne – yes! I had to go and look. It’s on the floor by Maurice’s desk …. and it’s snowing! Yuck…
#44 by Polycarp on December 25, 2009 – 2:15 am
I think that Le Donne has a good start, but I also believe that he is circular somewhat with Tradition, especially Incarnational viewpoints. He essentially comes to the same conclusion an apologist would but with more roads traveled.
#45 by Polycarp on December 25, 2009 – 1:54 am
True and fair enough. Of course, some believe that any scholarship except that which conforms to their standard is inherently evil. Personally, I am looking forward to spending more time in 2nd Temple Judaism, with the aid of Bauckham
hoping to end the year in a Master’s program. I’m not a fan of some of the historical critical methods, but I did like the social memory concept of the Historigraphical Jesus.
#46 by steph on December 25, 2009 – 1:47 am
That would be an independent historical critical approach … not all modern scholarship is helpful – we’ve still got the apologists and the religion hating atheists and the blinking mythers!
#47 by steph on December 24, 2009 – 3:47 pm
That’s absolutely lovely, Joel. I hope you and your family have a wonderful Christmas together.
#48 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 5:32 pm
Thank you a great deal, Steph, and to your and yours a warm (which I know you already have) holiday season.
#49 by steph on December 24, 2009 – 6:01 pm
Thanks – but I haven’t! Maurice and I are housebound with snow and horridible ice while my large whanau are congregating down in Aotearoa at the beach!! But I just love the picture you’ve recreated. That’s warmly wonderful.
#50 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 6:14 pm
Here, the snow is melting, and we are expecting a rather nice day tomorrow with some family. Presents in the morning, I reckon, then Turkey, blessed Turkey. Its a real tradition.
#51 by steph on December 24, 2009 – 9:39 pm
Bliss …. I expect my whanau will be having a barbecue – last year the boys went bush and shot a goat, a rabbit and a pig or was it a deer, hung, marinated and barbecued with lots of salads … of course I skip the meats but still participate in it’s cooking. And then of course piles of presents for millions of children – mainly homemade, they’re a crafty lot my family – and big decorated pine tree dripping with pine needles, Christmas lilies with heavenly scent … I wanna go home!!!!
#52 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 9:41 pm
Mean kiwi…just mean….
We’ll have our turkey and stuffing/dressing tomorrow with a carrot souffle, bread rolls, iced tea, broccoli and cheese casserole and some dessert.
#53 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 6:20 pm
You know, Steph, while you are snowbound…if you wanted to write a post on the value of modern scholarship…. Just saying
#54 by steph on December 24, 2009 – 9:47 pm
That would be an independent historical critical approach … not all modern scholarship is helpful – we’ve still got the apologists and the religion hating atheists and the blinking mythers!
#55 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 9:54 pm
True and fair enough. Of course, some believe that any scholarship except that which conforms to their standard is inherently evil. Personally, I am looking forward to spending more time in 2nd Temple Judaism, with the aid of Bauckham
hoping to end the year in a Master’s program. I’m not a fan of some of the historical critical methods, but I did like the social memory concept of the Historigraphical Jesus.
#56 by steph on December 24, 2009 – 10:13 pm
And 2nd Temple Judaism will be very ‘helpful’, and Bauckham has produced some excellent work … although he’s beginning to slide dangerously towards apologetics…
I wasn’t impressed with the method applied by whats his name in Historiographical Jesus and what he avoids although April de Conick has done excellent and very helpful work on social memory.
#57 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 10:15 pm
I think that Le Donne has a good start, but I also believe that he is circular somewhat with Tradition, especially Incarnational viewpoints. He essentially comes to the same conclusion an apologist would but with more roads traveled.
#58 by steph on December 24, 2009 – 10:19 pm
Le Donne – yes! I had to go and look. It’s on the floor by Maurice’s desk …. and it’s snowing! Yuck…
#59 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 10:22 pm
Hahha! It was 50 today!
#60 by steph on December 24, 2009 – 10:33 pm
You’re cruel! I think 50 is more than 10 – we’re minus 4. It never gets cold like this at home.
#61 by Polycarp on December 24, 2009 – 10:34 pm
Hahhahahahaha!
#62 by steph on December 24, 2009 – 10:42 pm
:-p
oh well I’m glad your children have better weather anyway
#63 by Newtaste on December 25, 2009 – 4:42 am
A good piece. As always.
At least some of the Catholic tradition of Joseph and Mary and Mary’s parents are based on Apocryphal sources. I worked this out from what is prayed at Novenas – and very little of it is in the Gospels.
#64 by Polycarp on December 25, 2009 – 4:45 am
There is a lot in the Catholic Tradition about Mary and Joseph which comes from the Proto-Gospel of James, I believe. What little we know of Joseph, from the Gospels, is of a man of a great love, I believe. We know that he kept the law, and we know what the Law said. We also know that he finally disobeyed the Law.
And thank you for the kind words, NT.
I hope all is well.
#65 by Polycarp on December 25, 2009 – 4:45 am
There is a lot in the Catholic Tradition about Mary and Joseph which comes from the Proto-Gospel of James, I believe. What little we know of Joseph, from the Gospels, is of a man of a great love, I believe. We know that he kept the law, and we know what the Law said. We also know that he finally disobeyed the Law.
And thank you for the kind words, NT.
I hope all is well.
#66 by Newtaste on December 25, 2009 – 4:42 am
A good piece. As always.
At least some of the Catholic tradition of Joseph and Mary and Mary’s parents are based on Apocryphal sources. I worked this out from what is prayed at Novenas – and very little of it is in the Gospels.
#67 by Newtaste on December 25, 2009 – 12:42 am
A good piece. As always.
At least some of the Catholic tradition of Joseph and Mary and Mary’s parents are based on Apocryphal sources. I worked this out from what is prayed at Novenas – and very little of it is in the Gospels.
#68 by Polycarp on December 25, 2009 – 12:45 am
There is a lot in the Catholic Tradition about Mary and Joseph which comes from the Proto-Gospel of James, I believe. What little we know of Joseph, from the Gospels, is of a man of a great love, I believe. We know that he kept the law, and we know what the Law said. We also know that he finally disobeyed the Law.
And thank you for the kind words, NT.
I hope all is well.
#69 by Javad_1328 on July 11, 2010 – 1:14 pm
don't we think if joseph calim he was mary husband, then he cover it her miracle perghant! the people if that time how could belief she be came perghant as miracle?!
#70 by Polycarp on July 11, 2010 – 4:04 pm
Javad, I am having a difficult time understanding what you mean.