Archive for category Church Government

Introduction to my new church

For those of you who have been following my journey of translation, you will note that I am now attending a radically different church than one in which I grew up in, and spent 30+ years in. This is a typology paper, rough draft, which was for my Church Administration class. I thought, since it is Saturday, and I am in Church Administration class at the moment, that I would share it with you.

Arguably, it would be best to identify a church based on its own merits and not in comparison with a smaller group generally removed from orthodox Christianity; however, human nature tends to argue against that which is right and goes for that which is natural. In attempting to compare my local congregation, Christ Church United Methodist Church, I have no real basis in identifying the typology except for my few months in attendance and my inclusion in several classes as well as the unique ability to get a bird’s eye view from helpful interviewees. That hasn’t stopped me from naturally comparing what is to what was, which admittedly distorts an unbiased attempt to answer the questions at hand. For example, having been taught to see only the pastor, or rather, to believe that the pastor is somehow the Vicar of Christ, gives me the learned response of seeing the pastor as the absolute center and all-controlling dictator of the congregation, answerable only to God, rather, I would say that my natural inclination is to see the pastor as center and everyone else as merely tools of the pastor with no real responsibility. With that acknowledge biased, I have tried to force objectivity and to arrive at a conclusion based on how I see other people respond to the congregation.

Currently, my family and I take several of the religious education classes at Christ Church, and I myself am involved further by participating in the Men’s Discussion Group as well as from time to time, enjoying the intercessory prayers offered mid-week. Our Sunday School class’s curriculum, I am told, was chosen by a vote of the class. This was done without influence of the pastor, as was the choosing of the Sunday School teacher. Said teacher later invited me to participate in the above mentioned discussion group which sees no signs of the pastor or any other paid staff person which represents the pastor. The leader of the group is a retired Bishop of the United Methodist Church, but if he is absent, someone else picks up the conversation and continues forward. The same is said of the Sunday School class in which when the teacher would be absent, he selected based on the recommendations of the class a substitute – without any clearance from the pastor. Further, the intercessory prayer group meets on their own and without professional leadership. Further, if memory serves, the church bulletin asks for dates and times of groups like these which meet, which encourages not only, in my opinion the formation of these cells but as well the participation in these cells.

Another hallmark of Christ Church is that when the pastor is absent alongside that of the associate pastor, the congregation doesn’t fall apart or seem somehow like they are treading water, waiting for the pastor to return. Our first visit was on a Sunday in which both the pastor and the associate pastor were at Annual Conference. While we were informed that the pastor wasn’t there, the attitudes – welcoming, friendly – didn’t change when the pastor did return. There was no gate-keeper to pass muster with, nor any off-putting cliques too easily seen. When the pastor did return, there was no visible change in the congregation. While the pastor serves as leader and visible figure head, leading the congregation through sermons and setting of programs, congregants aren’t dependent upon the pastor for day to day operations, feelings, or their own spirituality.

The goal of Christ Church seems to be two-fold. While they focus on outreach to the community they also focus on in-reach and congregant organizing. Their religious education opportunities are not neatly contained on Sunday morning but are offered throughout the week and in various forms and each are promoted by their own groups. Circles of fellowships are formed in these classes, but not cliques – and it wouldn’t serve those cliques well if they did as from my view, the circles often overlap one another via the classes and such groups as the UMW, the UMM, and even the men’s discussion group. It has been my personal experience that while these groups are often historic, by that I mean that the people have known each for a considerable amount of time, they are not exclusionary. With each group that either my wife or I have participated in, we have been welcomed as a full member of the group, our opinions sought, and generally edified. There is diversity in religious education and because of this, a natural diversity in fellowship.

Christ Church serves as a leader in the community as well, and not only because of political attachments of its members. As one of the historic downtown churches, Christ Church has weathered the storms of time, including burning, rebuilding, recession and the depletion of Charleston’s population. If memory serves, again, a good portion of the congregants drive more than thirty minutes for a service. There is a communal feel to Christ Church, which is not easily drawn to particular families. Further, there is the social justice aspect of the outreach, which includes help to the poor, exploration of social ills and concerns, and a focus on providing more services by partnering with other congregations, even across denominational lines, to reach more people without any demands on their own spirituality.

Not being familiar with all of the ins and outs of the lay leadership, I am still assured that committees play a vital role in the operation of Christ Church. From my past experiences, committees were not used and essentially preached against, as a means of giving more control to the singular pastor. Yet, at Christ Church, committees encourage participation in program direction and are often the means of success for individual programs. Further, it seems that lay leaders are grafted into the system by informal means and confirmed, sometimes, by votes. I don’t believe that this is based on family connections or connections to the pastor, but due to their longevity of membership and easily seen leadership qualifications.

The pastor at Christ Church doesn’t seem to be overbearing or one who pushes himself on new visitors, but takes the leadership role of influencing, guiding, and building bridges. In smaller congregations, new members often go through stages akin to new romances, where there is a rush to euphoria when the new member, or potential new members, steps through the door. They are greeted, welcomed, hands shook and tours are given, introductions made, and numerous follow-up phone calls are made to insure that the visitor becomes a member. There is no getting to know one another, but almost a need to elope into membership. At least at Christ Church, from my experience, there is a development phase, where things are introduced to the visitors based on their needs. They are warmly welcomed, but with no push to be a part of the congregation formally. The pastor doesn’t set the new visitor high and proclaim loud and glorious things, nor seek to see in the new visitor a sign of the pastor’s own place in God. Instead, the pastor at Christ Church makes himself available, as does his staff, for questions, help and introductions. There is no quick marriage of the new visitor to the congregation; instead, the relationship is given the time and space it needs to develop. The pastor is not distant by any means, but generally seems to respond to the visitors based on their needs.

The church provides three worship services, each unique, and to each is a loyalty among their attendees. There is one which is more contemporary followed by a traditional service, and for the final service on Sunday, a high church service. These services respond not only to the people’s individual time concerns, but so too their spiritual needs. There is no forced style or participation in the service. From my seat, I see different voices weekly added to the chorus of speakers for various parts of the service. Further, as odd as it seemed to me, the pastor regularly relinquishes his pulpit to his associate pastor or others, giving away as well the cherished radio sermon to others. Simply, pastor is chief servant, not only to the congregation but so too to his staff.

In determining the final typology for Christ Church United Methodist Church, Charleston, West Virginia, I can only point, with the evidences above, to it being typed as the Program Church; however, it does contain some elements of the typologies which surround it. Primarily, the pastor is more than a pastor at Christ Church but a community leader as well. Further, while he sets the direction, he has cast a vision for the church and is moving others in that direction. The congregation, however, still maintains some characteristics of informality associated with the Awkward Sized Church. Leadership still seems to be something easily done by unelected members who exhibit willingness to volunteer or who have some expertise. There is also a well established UMW group, but the UMM group is just getting started. While communication is generally done in print, there is lacking a centralized index of activities because some activities tend to be informal, such as the intercessory prayer group. While Christ Church is a program church, it has the foundation and the vision to become a corporate church rather than simply sinking into the full awkward typology.

 

5 Comments

Pastors can reject (eject?) church members

United Methodist Church
Image via Wikipedia

A United Methodist pastor has the right to determine local church membership, even if the decision is based on whether the potential member is gay or lesbian.

Annual (regional) conferences cannot limit that right or ask the church’s top court to set policy, the United Methodist Judicial Council ruled during its Oct. 27-30 meeting.

“The General Conference is the only body authorized and able to resolve the issue for the Church,” wrote Jon R. Gray in a concurring opinion on one of the October cases. The General Conference is the denomination’s top legislative body and meets every four years.

Court upholds pastor’s right to accept members – UMC.org.

Long story short – a pastor can bar you from joining the congregation based on pretty much any quantifier that he or she wants. At least in the United Methodist Church.

This was based on a pastor’s refusal to allow an openly gay man to join the congregation as a member of the congregation. (Yes, stressed)

My wife and I were talking about this issue last night, on a different matter. Can a congregation vote to exclude someone? Yes, I think so, especially if the church government is such that members have special privileges in deciding the direction of the body. Sometimes, it becomes necessary for a congregation to do so to preserve the peace and harmony of itself. You cannot and should not bar someone from coming to church, but congregational membership is a different story, I believe, especially when the property is (almost) communal.

But, we’ll see how this is played out.

I will say that the Confessing Church movement is ecstatic over this, which almost makes me not so happy about it….

 

38 Comments

Special Guest Post from Fr. Steven

Stained glass at St John the Baptist's Anglica...
Image via Wikipedia

Since I am gone for today, Fr. Steve said that I could repost his post –

It seems that Christians and especially ministers of all traditions forget the lessons of history. The church in the United States is at a critical point in history and is fast losing its credibility due to the arrogance and excess of many churches as well as individual clergy in matters related to personal behavior, financial accountability as well as accountability before the law concerning clergy that who have committed grievous crimes against children and others. Likewise there is the nearly incestuous relationship between many ministers and those holding political and or economic power in which quite often one cannot tell where the “gospel” ends and the politics begin. This exists in many churches large and small and spans the denominational spectrum not being the sole property of any particular body. There is also the matter of accountability in which it seems that many churches, ministries and ministers practice a “do as I say, not as I do” lifestyle holding their subordinate clergy as well as parishioners to a higher standard than they practice themselves.

The United States has always had a strong Christian heritage that has impacted its faith as well as its national life. This is not of itself a bad thing as one looks at how churches and Christian leaders have made an impact that goes beyond them and is beneficial to the nation as a whole. Some of these achievements include the pressure put on James Madison by Virginia Baptists to ensure a guarantee of religious freedom in the Bill of Rights, the abolition of slavery the ending of child labor, the Civil Rights movement as well as numerous charitable and public interest oriented ministries to care for society’s most disadvantaged citizens as well as the aliens that have lived among us. At the same time there were many Christians, churches and ministers that supported slavery, an established state religion, segregation and many other issues. That being said churches and individual ministers have made a huge contribution to American life and community that cannot be easily dismissed despite the many problems, controversies, and scandals that have surrounded churches of almost all denominations since the founding of the United States. Religious liberty as well as Christian churches and religion in general has traditionally been seen as a positive rather than a negative aspect of the United States going back to Alexis de Tocqueville in his comments on American democracy.

Clergy have enjoyed a special status in American life that exists in large part due the Bill of Rights and the Jeffersonian understanding of an “eternal wall of separation” between church and state. This is because clergy were seen as fair arbiters because they were not an appendage of the state as were the clergy of most European states that had established state religion. Thus the “clericalism” of Europe which was seen as a danger by our Founding Fathers was not a major issue. Yes some of the founders recognized a potential danger but that did not stop Congress from treating clergy and churches favorably in the early years of the republic and worked to ensure that no church became a “State church.” Over the years since the founding of the United States clergy of many denominations have made many positive contributions to our Nation in both their pastoral and prophetic roles. At the same time over the years some clergy have attempted to use their status and privileges as an entry into the elite parts of society, especially in the political, government policy and financial realms.

The point to be short is that many clergy in the United States, especially those in influential pulpits and ministries have forgotten the dangers of “clericalism” and the abuses of clerics who use their office as clergy to gain political, financial and personal power. Jesus told his disciples that they had to be servants and not seek wealth, status or position something that was echoed by the New Testament writers as well as many of the Ante-Nicene Fathers.

By their budgets ye shall know them….I saw the report of the Reverend Robert Schuler of the “Crystal Cathedral” megachurch which declared bankruptcy last week being $43 Million dollars in debt and embroiled in struggles about Schuler’s successor call for his parishioners to give more money. He asked “tithers to double tithe” and those that do not tithe to “start tithing.” He talked about what the church has given to them and earned their support. I found this to be a rather pompous plea from a man who has had the ear of Presidents and leaders in the political and business world. The fact is that Southern California has been terribly hard hit by the economic downturn and recession and that obviously includes many of his parishioners both those that worship at the Cathedral as well as those who what Schuler’s “Hour of Power” show. The Chrystal Cathedral now has to live “month to month on $2 Million dollars a month” and has cut back staff, curtailed programs and sold property to try to make ends meet. I’m sorry but when you live off of other people’s money you should never build a ministry requiring millions of dollars on the presumption that if you get it wrong that the faithful givers should have to bail you out. I saw this at a local level a few years back and it all but destroyed the local church and the denomination that church belonged. I wonder how many more megachurches built on piles of debt are facing what is happening at the Chrystal Cathedral.

By their budgets ye shall know them….Other churches at denominational and local levels have often become embroiled in banking scandals that tarnished the reputation of those churches, their leaders and disillusioned their membership often causing mass defections to other churches or leave the organized church all together. The Roman Catholic Church had to deal with a major scandal involving the Vatican Bank in the 1970s and 1980s and have recently had other allegations of another potential banking scandal involving the Vatican have surfaced.

By their budgets ye shall know them….I worked for a fairly reputable Television ministry while I was a seminary student. The common plea of these types of ministries is that they “are on a mission from God” well, maybe that is a Blues Brother’s paraphrase but you get my drift. Most are not part of any denominational structure and have little oversight and presume that since someone might watch them that they are entitled to financial support. They do not ask their audience for actual input into their “mission” strategy, they just ask for their audience’s money to do with as they “and as the Lord would have them to do” with it. This of course is not the sole property of television ministries but it occurs in many churches as well. If someone questions the church and its financial accountability they are accused of “being unfaithful,” “not hearing God,” or being “disobedient to God’s will or to the church.” Since many churches and ministries suffer a terrible lack of accountability and oversight these abuses are more widespread than we would want to believe. Sometimes it takes personal experience to see this but when one sees it up close and in person the blinders can be removed. In regard to television ministries in particular the amount of money required to keep their programs on the air is beyond exorbitant. It comes often from those that are barely surviving financially even in “good times” and the most desperate of people “believing in God for a miracle” in response to obediently shelling out of their meager incomes to ministries in response to persuasive pleas by ministers that should know better. The motivation, love and obedience of these often wonderful people is exploited in order to support air programs that have little impact on the world despite the boastings of these ministers that they are “fulfilling the great commission.” One has to ask if this is the case why there is so little to be seen in our society as a result of all the money poured into these pricy ministries.

By their budgets ye shall know them….If money was the only thing it would be a manageable problem…. Oh but wait money and power is the root of the problem as the problem extends to lifestyles of ministers and other church leaders which are hardly supported by the demands of the Gospel. It is not uncommon at all to see clergy living off of the offerings of their parishioners live opulent lifestyles and when times get tough demand more money from their flocks rather than amending their own behaviors. Instead of accountability, repentance and a change in behavior there is a demand for obedience from their flock and if the flock objects they are the ones that are vilified. This again cuts across denominational lines and includes Protestants and Catholics, those in parish as well as those in parachurch, television and radio ministries. In my old church those clergy who could not meet their tithe for whatever reason were told that they were being “disobedient to their vows” which instead of vows to the Church in regard to orthodoxy as well as orthopraxy were narrowed down to if you were paying your tithe on time. I remember one Bishop who left the church to go elsewhere told the assembled priests in his diocese that the tithe was the “essential test of obedience, and what bound us together.” Families and parishioners of parishes were described by another Bishop as “tithing units” not people and when I was in the reserves contemplating a mission parish start up was told that in order to be “successful” the church needed at least “x-number of tithing units.” Doctrine or even other forms of public witness were secondary to paying the tithe. That church had many major financial scandals that are well documented elsewhere so I won’t go into detail about them.

By their budgets ye shall know them…. If churches spend more money on the salaries of their pastors than they do on outreach to the poor or missions something is severely out of order, one cannot imagine the Apostles of those Ante-Nicene Fathers who suffered poverty and persecution advocating for what amounts to be an “Imperial” church even those that advocated a firm hierarchy in regard to faith and belief. When leaders of a church, especially a small church get together and dine in luxury on the monies donated by their often impoverished flocks it shows a tacit denial of the Gospel and lack of respect or care for the people of God.

By their budgets ye shall know them….When church building programs and plant maintenance are extravagant and require massive amounts of money to sustain without demanding more from their parishioners than something is out of kilter. When chandeliers cost more than a mission budget for the poor something is wrong. My Church History professor from who I appropriated the “by their budgets ye shall know them” line used to say that “God is going to get us for our stained glass windows when we neglect the poor.” I love good church architecture including stained glass windows but it is presumptive on God the people of God for churches, ministries and ministers to demand monies when they have failed to play and manage effective especially when in spite of economic indicators they spend like drunken sailors and expect others to pick up the tab while crying crocodile tears about how “God’s plans will be thwarted” if their ministry fails.

By their budgets ye shall know them….Back prior to the Protestant Reformation in Europe there was a large amount of discontent which focused on the arrogance, opulence and financial demands of the Catholic Church. In fact much of Dr. Martin Luther’s protest in the 95 Thesis dealt with the manner in which the Church used a practice called indulgences and the selling of “relics” to fund the construction of St Peters Basilica in Rome. In people gave because they believed men like John Tetzel who preached in regard to indulgences “a penny into the coffer rings a soul from purgatory springs.” Of course there was the manner that the Church also used its power to reward or punish rulers which was also part of the problem but the complaint of many reformers was often directly related to the Churches’ financial as well as political abuses of its members and nations to buttress its position in Europe. Unfortunately I do not think that we have learned this lesson and that Churches and ministries in the United States are losing membership and the trend is that people are opting for individual expressions of faith rather than become a part of institutions that they feel are out of touch with real people. I believe that if things do not change there will be a mass exodus from many churches and religious institutions because of the odious nature of the financial dealings and pressure put on people to support questionable programs and lavish lifestyles.

By their budgets ye shall know them….There are honest and hard working ministers and churches that emphasize ministry and care for people as part of the Gospel message. Many are foreign missionaries that eke out support while working full time in “tentmaker” professions in order to fund their missions without unduly burdening those that support them. I know many people like this and for them whether they be working in foreign missions or caring for the poor at home live the Gospel in word and deed and nothing in this essay should be construed to be against such people or their missions. I may disagree with someone’s theology but when I see them demonstrate humility and the love of God in all that they do I can only commend them.

You see my friends and readers my experience leads me to believe that people are still searching for authentic faith and spirituality and have not necessarily given up on orthodox Christian beliefs. The problem is they are finding little of substance in many churches and other religious institutions. Novelist and write Anne Rice recently did this, leaving “Christianity” but not Christ and I fully understand her reasoning for doing so.

Martin Luther and the 95 Thesis: What if the Church had listened to him rather than branding him as a heretic and criminal?

Some will say that by writing this that I am “causing division in the Church” or the more pious “causing division in the body of Christ.” However that is a red herring argument that attempts to divert attention from the real problem. If the Church and I mean across denominations not any particular body fails to reform itself it will fall on its own and fall hard and in the process harm the faith of many people. Churches which have to defend the indefensible to “retain unity” are those that are in schism from Christ, not those that raise issues that the society at large recognizes but church and religious leaders seem incapable of admitting. The Church must reform and a big part of that in the United States involves how we deal with wealth. By their budgets ye shall know them.

This essay will be continued as I move to the next segment which will be about the incestuous relationship between many ministers and those of the political and financial elites. I’m sure that I will come up with a catch title for that essay but need to ruminate some more.

Please go here to comment:

Reforming the Church Today Part One: By their Budgets Ye Shall know Them | Padresteve’s World…Musings of a Passionate Moderate.

 

2 Comments

Exploring Congregational Vision Statements: The Crossing Church

This is for a Seminary Class, although this is more of a post than an actual paper.

You can find the statement here.

First, some highlights:

TRANSFORMED CULTURES THROUGH THE POWER OF JESUS CHRIST

We see a Church that is intensely Kingdom focused
The Church that we see is a winsome church of influence. We see a church permeating entire cities, regions, states and countries with explosive Spirit aided movements, a Church hardly able to contain its growth. We see a Church so powerful in its commitment to the Kingdom that cities and nations cannot ignore it.

The Church that we see has a message so captivating and clear that lives are forever changed; a message beamed to the peoples of the earth through media and multiple technologies. We see a Church with one vision, one message, in thousands of locations.

The Church that we see is a Church so committed to raising, training and empowering each new generation of leaders that all of our ministries resources are funneled to that end.

The Church that we see is diversified, agile and responsive, able to function in unity and complexity like the human body; capable of unlimited growth. It is comprised of cells, each aiding and supplying the body’s Kingdom movements.

….

We see gatherings of thousands, stadiums being filled. Praying for and seeing the repentance of cities, officials and government leaders.

Generally, everything else, I agree with.

These parts here, I do not. I do not like the emphasis on geo-political boundaries. There is no focus on the individual, but on ‘cities, regions, states and countries.’ Is it about the Gospel or about spiritual manifestations of supernatural power? I see one statement that comes close to the Gospel, ‘We see a Church filled with repentant people responding to Christ’s call to salvation.’ They would rather see a civic minded church, or at least attuned to the physical needs of the community around it, but still focuses on geo-political revival supplanted by ‘miracles.’

This is for discussion, and I don’t discount of the great things that they are no doubt trying to do and may very well be doing. But, what do you think?

 

,

No Comments

The Church is a Trust

Sitting in Friday’s Church Administration class, we watched a video where the speaker was addressing the issue of congregations meeting the shift in culture. He said that the Church is a Trust, and that those who are ‘in charge’ are holding that Trust, managing it, and preserving it.

Let me just say that the pastors in the class are impressive – young and/or just entering the ministry, but impressive with their desire to be people of God and to serve in their capacity, not as administrators or managers, but as shepherds.

But, I think that the speaker is right…the Church is not ours, but God’s and those who come after us. It ceased being ours when it came to our generation. A pastor doesn’t own the church, but is a caretaker. I think that the same think can be said about the Scriptures, Tradition, etc… It is not ‘ours’ and ceases to be for us when we take the reigns. Instead, whenever we start participating in the life of the Church, either by becoming leaders, exegeting Scripture, theologizing, mission work, etc… it is not for us that we do those things, but for those who are coming after us. The Church if God’s, of that there is no doubt, but it is a sacred Trust held by us for those to whom we pass it down too.

We owe it to those who will take up the reigns, then, to treat what has been given to us as theirs, to be careful with what we do with it and how we use these things.

 

4 Comments

Is your pastor accountable?

Growing up in churches in which the pastor was never to be questioned, I really didn’t know what accountability was. As a matter of fact, I was taught that committees, elders, etc… and anything who could temper the pastor’s authority was heresy. What people like Eddie Long and other pastors who preside over their congregations teach us is that absolute power corrupts absolutely…

Regardless, pastors and experts say the Long case demonstrates how vulnerable the country’s independent churches still are to being damaged by the misbehavior — sexual, financial or otherwise — of leaders whose considerable influence often comes with temptation and little accountability.

“The more powerful a Christian leader becomes, the fewer restraints that other people can put on them,” said the Rev. H.B. London Jr., vice president of ministry outreach for Focus on the Family. “Some of these men and women become so powerful that no one can tell them ‘no.’”

Read the rest here:

Some churches like Ga. pastor’s thin on safeguards – Yahoo! News.

Personally, accountability prevents, or lessens the degree which they happen…

And further, submit to one another out of reverence for Christ. (Eph 5:21 NLT)

ht

 

1 Comment

Was Apollos Disobedient to God? Does his salvation count?

After all, a woman taught him…

Meanwhile, a Jew named Apollos, an eloquent speaker who knew the Scriptures well, had arrived in Ephesus from Alexandria in Egypt. He had been taught the way of the Lord, and he taught others about Jesus with an enthusiastic spirit and with accuracy. However, he knew only about John’s baptism. When Priscilla and Aquila heard him preaching boldly in the synagogue, they took him aside and explained the way of God even more accurately. Apollos had been thinking about going to Achaia, and the brothers and sisters in Ephesus encouraged him to go. They wrote to the believers in Achaia, asking them to welcome him. When he arrived there, he proved to be of great benefit to those who, by God’s grace, had believed. He refuted the Jews with powerful arguments in public debate. Using the Scriptures, he explained to them that Jesus was the Messiah. (Act 18:24-28 NLT)

I know that it is painful, but the wife was mentioned before her husband is not a stylist liberty. The pair is mention three other times in Paul’s writings, with one of them being the standard order.

Calvin comments,

Also, we see that at that time women were not so ignorant of the word of God as the Papists will have them; forasmuch as we see that one of. the chief teachers of the Church was instructed by a woman. Notwithstanding, we must remember that Priscilla did execute this function of teaching at home in her own house, that she might not overthrow the order prescribed by God and nature.

So even Calvin understood Apollos to have been instructed by Priscilla…

 

,

1 Comment